Cognitive bias: Gambler’s Fallacy

You need to recruit a junior manager for your retail department. 

You know that a lot of people are qualified for this job, equally men and women. 

Today, you are supposed to meet ten candidates. This morning, you met six female candidates.

What is the most likely scenario of the repartition of males and females for this afternoon?

  1. MMMM
  2. FFFF
  3. MFMF

As there is a lot of potential candidates with an equal repartition between men and women, the events (meeting a candidate of a specific gender) are independent. 

Each time you meet a candidate, you have a 50% chance that the candidate is male or female. 

As a consequence, the fact to have met 6 female candidates in the morning does not impact the gender of the candidates in the afternoon. 

The three scenarii have thus an equal probability to occur. 

Yet, we often think that if something happens more frequently than normal during some period, then it will happen less frequently in the future.

This is the gambler’s fallacy (or hot hand fallacy).

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42.

1 Comment

  • HALVOR LOGNVIK 29 November 2021

    There is a lot of ifs and buts in this context. What country you are in , what age of the applicants , whether the women are single or housewifes etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.